I wrote a blog article a few months ago giving kudos to the guys at CodeSmith after my discovery of PLINQO 2.0. Since then, I haven’t done much with LINQ-to-SQL because the legacy projects at my day job use Castle ActiveRecord with NHibernate. But I recently started a new project (giving me the freedom to investigate other technologies) and was pleasantly surprised to find PLINQO 3.0. In addition to a new major code revision, I found that CodeSmith released a new website with more information about the benefits of PLINQO and sample usage.
In case you’re not familiar with PLINQO, this set of code-generation templates is designed to enhance the LINQ-to-SQL development experience. They’re not only a time-saver like most code generation templates, but they allow you to overcome many of the limitations of “raw” LINQ-to-SQL. See Does LINQ StinQ? Not with PLINQO!
My first article covered some of the main benefits of PLINQO 2.0, including:
- Generates one file per entity instead of one massive DBML file.
- Generates partial classes where custom code can be written and won’t be overwritten.
- Generated entity files are added to the project as code behind files to their corresponding custom entity files.
- Adds customizable business rules engine to enforce entity validation, business and security rules.
- Generation of entity manager classes… Provides access to common queries based on primary keys, foreign keys, and indexes.
- Ability to automatically remove object prefix and suffixes (ie. tbl and usp) [based on RegEx].
In addition to those features, PLINQO 3.0 has the following benefits:
- Entity Detach – Detach entities from one DataContext and attach to another (very useful for caching scenarios).
- Entity Clone – Create copies of entities in-memory, set only the properties that need to be changed and persist as a new object with a new primary key.
- Many-to-Many Relationships – Yes, M:M can be done in LINQ-to-SQL without writing goofy code to manage the link tables.
- Auditing – The app can track all property changes complete with a copy of the old value and new value. Tracked changes can be read iteratively or dumped to an XML string.
- Batch Updates and Deletes – You can perform updates and deletes on records based on criteria on the SQL Server without pulling each record into your app first. I’d already been using another implementation of this concept, but it’s nice to have it built into PLINQO.
- Multiple Result Sets – PLINQO can pull multiple recordsets back in a single request. This can be done either by using a stored procedure or using the ExecuteQuery method passing a list of queries as parameters.
I think some of those benefits may have existed in the 2.0 release, but weren’t documented. I’m glad to see they’re starting to provide more documentation and samples. It would still be nice to see more, however (as it occurs to me) your custom PLINQO code really sits on top of LINQ-to-SQL, so all of the standard LINQ documentation applies.
I do have some suggestions for CodeSmith to implement in future versions of PLINQO:
- I’m fond of the IRepository pattern because of unit testing with frameworks such as Rhino Mocks. I’ve seen a couple of implementations of IRepository with LINQ (example 1, example 2). This should be a code generation option.
- I’d like to see a DataContext session factory with per-web-request lifestyle. This is available in other ORM systems like ActiveRecord. After some digging, I found an example of this that also demonstrates integration with Microsoft’s MVC and Castle Windsor (IoC). Sweet.
- There are some helpful LINQ libraries out there, such as LINQKit and the LINQ Dynamic Query Library. It would be nice to include these and/or other free libraries with PLINQO.
- I’ve gotten the impression that Microsoft is going to favor the Entity Framework (LINQ-to-Entities) over LINQ-to-SQL. I’d love to see PLINQO adapted to support the Entity Framework. That would certainly placate the domain-driven design fans along with those who use db’s other than MS SQL.
Finally, a bit of a rant: I’m kind-of annoyed that PLINQO only has one way to select the tables you want to include in code generation: you have to write a RegEx to identify tables to exclude. I’ve worked on several projects where I want to generate entities for less than 50% of the tables in my database. For instance, when writing modules for DotNetNuke, I only want to generate entities for my 5 tables, not the 100+ tables that come with a DNN installation.
NetTiers had a dialog to select tables for code generation. It sure would be nice to bring that back in PLINQO. If a dialog box is too much trouble, at least there could be a switch to specify whether my RegEx is an include list or an exclude list. I submitted a ticket to CodeSmith on this one. Please vote and add comments on their website if you support this idea. How about it, CodeSmith?
See the new PLINQO website at http://www.plinqo.com/ for downloads, documentation and an offer to get a free copy of CodeSmith. I also suggest that you watch both introductory videos: Video 1. Video 2.